ZAPRASZA.net POLSKA ZAPRASZA KRAKÓW ZAPRASZA TV ZAPRASZA ART ZAPRASZA
Dodaj artykuł  

KIM JESTEŚMY ARTYKUŁY CIEKAWE LINKI 2002-2009 NASZ PATRONAT KRONIKA KRAKOWA DZIŚ W POLSCE

Inne artykuły

Czego nie rozumie liberalna hołota 
20 listopad 2015      Artur Łoboda
Konfrontacja sił w Europie w 1939 roku 
29 kwiecień 2011      Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Ku czemu zmierzają politycy? 
15 listopad 2012      Artur Łoboda
Bogusław Wolniewicz wstępuje do PZPR  
1 luty 2016      Artur Łoboda
W 35. rocznicę Stanu Wojennego oskarżam PiS! 
13 grudzień 2016     
Trzecie wezwanie o uzasadnienie wysłania obywatelki państwa Izrael - Yael Bartana - jako reprezentantki polskiej kultury na 54. Biennale Sztuki w Wenecji 
6 maj 2013      Artur Łoboda
Cieć w Ministerstwie 
19 lipiec 2016      Artur Łoboda
Coraz więcej pewności, że Merkel zaprosiła imigrantów jako lont, który ostatecznie podpali Unię w dotychczasowym kształcie 
28 czerwiec 2016      Tomasz Domalewski
Pederasta Zawieyski 
5 marzec 2016      Artur Łoboda
Neostalinowska Rewolucja Kulturalna w Trzeciej RP 
13 maj 2013      Artur Łoboda
Demokracja strachu 
21 wrzesień 2014      www.polskawalczaca.com
Na co było stać Rząd Tuska 
23 padziernik 2014      Artur Łoboda
Sto kilkadziesiąt pytań do p. prezydenta A. Dudy i p. premier B. Szydło oraz do władz PiS-u (III)  
15 padziernik 2016      Jerzy Robert Nowak
Komorowski dla młodzieży 
13 maj 2015     
Sędzia Wiesław Johann o wymiarze sprawiedliwości 
18 padziernik 2016      Blogpressportal
Do czego zmierza PiS? 
5 sierpień 2016      Artur Łoboda
Liczba 96 
16 sierpień 2010      Artur Łoboda
Marian Hemar - Katyń 
23 sierpień 2011     
Dekomunizacja - to wciąż aktualne hasło 
8 styczeń 2015      Artur Łoboda
Globalism - conclusions 2011 by Artur Loboda 
1 lipiec 2011      Artur Łoboda

 
 

The Neocon’s Defeat in Iraq: On to Iran

The Obama Administration’s announcement of a complete troop withdrawal from Iraq is a stunning defeat for the neocons. The neocon plan was an indefinite military presence in Iraq on the model of the continuing American military bases in Japan and Germany after WWII. Obviously, Iran is a big winner, at least for now, with an ally in the Shiite-dominated government of Iraq.

Of great interest is whether Iraq will maintain the democratic institutions established by the Americans. In the long run, I suspect that from the viewpoint of the neocons, the operation certainly bought time — the time needed for Iraq to rebuild and once again pose a danger to Israeli interests.

It’s too soon to tell, but I expect Iraq will revert to the Arabic norm of autocratic governments cemented by kinship ties among a dominant elite. Democracy is a Western institution with at best shallow roots in the rest of the world. The biggest lie in the neocon Iraq war promotion (apart from WMD—facilitated by neocons manning U.S. intelligence services; see here, p. 48ff)) was academic Middle East expert Bernard Lewis (a strong Zionist with close personal relationships with the Israeli political and military establishment) maintaining that there was a long tradition of democracy in Arab cultures that could easily be unleashed by a military invasion. Lewis is a textbook example where a strongly identified Jew uses his status as a professor at an elite institution (Princeton) and access to the elite media to advance his ethnic interests.

When Iraq reverts to form, it will be yet another nail in the coffin that non-Western peoples can easily adopt Western cultural forms. This is the basis not only of the neocons’ rationale for invading the world, it is also a subtext for why immigration into Western countries does not endanger the institutional framework of the host societies. As repeatedly maintained at TOO, when Whites become a political minority in the foreseeable future, there will be a decline and eventual eradication of European cultural forms of democracy, constitutionalism, and the illegitimacy of close kinship connections as the basis for political power. Whites have much to fear about a future without constitutional protections surrounded by peoples with a strong sense of historical hatred motivated by real and imagined injustices at the hands of Whites. The fact that intellectual basis for has been so firmly planted among our elites and in a substantial proportion of the people as well is a long term disaster for Whites.

The other day I saw Sean Hannity dismissing any threat from immigration because the culture will remain. Dream on. And why would you risk everything on a belief (that Western cultural forms will be maintained no matter what the ethnic structure of the population) when that belief may well not be true. Indeed, all we know about the costs of multiculturalism shows the flimsy basis of the multicultural, diversity-is-good ideology. The key finding is that there is much more conflict in multicultural societies—conflict that has often resulted in deadly violence and victimization of the relatively powerless. Can we really trust the assurances of an intellectual establishment dominated by people who have repeatedly shown that they are far more concerned with advancing their ethnic interests than in dealing with reality?

Not to mention that the ethnic interests of Whites are clearly compromised even if Western cultural forms were to endure.

Naturally, the neocons are not at all happy with this outcome. Writing in the LA Times, Frederick W. Kagan (American Enterprise Institute) and Kimberly Kagan (Institute for the Study of War, yet another neocon lobbying group) note that Iraq fails to meet the appropriate standards of sovereignty, stability and self-reliance—all touted by Obama in his rationale for troop withdrawal:

Its sovereignty is hollow because of the continued activities of Iranian-backed militias in its territory. Its stability is fragile, since the fundamental disputes among ethnic and sectarian groups remain unresolved. And it is not in any way self-reliant. The Iraqi military cannot protect its borders, its airspace or its territorial waters without foreign assistance.

Note particularly the point that ethnic and sectarian conflict has not been resolved and, as they say later, “are likely to devolve into armed conflict once again.” I agree, and the result is that eventually Iraq will revert to the Arab norm, as outlined above, in which there is a dominant elite cemented ultimately by kinship and with at best the trappings of democracy. Contrary to the neocon perspective, staying there another 50 years would not change this likely outcome.

The biggest worry for Kagan and Kagan is that Israel’s greatest enemy is the big winner:

In a year that also saw the “Arab Spring,” it will ultimately be Iran that emerges ascendant in Iraq and throughout the Middle East. America’s defeat is nothing to be relieved about.

The idea that America has anything to fear from an ascendant Iran and a rebuilt Iraq is preposterous, but it’s a different story from the perspective of Israel and its supporters.

For the neocons this is a defeat, but not fatal. If Iran is the winner, this lends even more urgency to the neocon promotion of a war with Iran. These efforts are continuing apace, now under the guise of retaliation for the supposed Iranian plan to assassinate the Saudi ambassador. One wonders just how such a plan could possibly be a pretext for the U.S. attacking Iran, but in the neocon intellectual wonderland, it makes perfect sense. Any rationale with even a shred of plausibility will be trotted out in the war against Israel’s enemies.
3 listopad 2011

Kevin MacDonald 

  

Komentarze

  

Archiwum

Apel do papieża o odwołanie Rydzyka
lipiec 10, 2007
Jak to się robi przewałki w Krakowie
luty 28, 2008
Świat według Wildsteina
luty 9, 2007
Olaf Swolkień
Wywczasy
maj 19, 2008
Marek Jastrząb
Budzenie ze snu o potędze
marzec 16, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
www.ściema.pl
lipiec 24, 2008
Marek Jastrząb
unity w pubach Dublina
lipiec 3, 2005
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
Przepraszamy za usterki
listopad 17, 2005
zaprasza.net
Stracone lata, stracone złudzenia
listopad 11, 2004
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
Amerykański działacz przeciw amerykańskim inwestycjom w... Polsce
maj 30, 2004
IAR
Plama na imażu i na stole – hipokryzja w mediach
luty 20, 2009
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
Lepper: papież już nie jest entuzjastą UE (znawca 3)
sierpień 18, 2002
PAP
Walka o dominację nad światem
padziernik 10, 2008
Gregory Akko
Robienie w konia
sierpień 26, 2006
Andrzej Warchałowski
Alek czyli głupi Jaśko
wrzesień 16, 2003
Artur Łoboda
Kogo unikać niczym komuny
padziernik 1, 2005
amen
Dziewczyna? Do ilu lat?
lipiec 14, 2006
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
Dla dobra Izraela od trockizmu do neokonserwtyzmu
maj 3, 2007
Ico Cyprian Pogonowski
Hausner musi boleć
luty 1, 2004
Adrian Dudkiewicz
Ideolog globalizmu - Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzeziński
(Tajna władza Świata)

listopad 19, 2005
www.naszdziennik.pl
 


Kontakt

Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2012 Polskie Niezależne Media