ZAPRASZA.net POLSKA ZAPRASZA KRAKÓW ZAPRASZA TV ZAPRASZA ART ZAPRASZA
Dodaj artykuł  

KIM JESTEŚMY ARTYKUŁY COVID-19 CIEKAWE LINKI 2002-2009 NASZ PATRONAT DZIŚ W KRAKOWIE DZIŚ W POLSCE

Inne artykuły

Z poślizgiem na słowa 
19 kwiecień 2020      Zygmunt Jan Prusiński
Dwie "Solidarności" 
1 wrzesień 2020     
Covid hucpah 
27 marzec 2020     
List do ŚMIECIA Adama Bodnara 
28 czerwiec 2017     
Justin Trudeau ukrył się przed Kanadyjczykami.
Kiedy ruszycie po polskojęzycznych eskiomosów?
 
29 styczeń 2022      Artur Łoboda
Ogłaszam oficjalny odwrót "epidemii" 
1 maj 2020      Artur Łoboda
Kłamstwa COVID 
29 kwiecień 2022     
Nadstawcie drugi policzek 
13 lipiec 2014      Artur Łoboda
Co dalej z nowelizacją ustawy o IPN? 
26 luty 2018     
"Najlepszy ynteres to ukraść państwo" 
18 maj 2019     
"Trzy twarze Juliana Haraschina". Dyskusja w Krakowskiej Loży Historii Współczesnej 
1 luty 2016      Krystian Brodacki
Zaledwie jedną nogą w wodzie 
21 maj 2015      Artur Łoboda
"Solidarność" bis 
1 czerwiec 2021     
Obłęd 
29 styczeń 2017     
Nie ma żadnego kowida! (5) 
9 październik 2021      Artur Łoboda
Koniec "tęczy" na Placu Zbawiciela 
27 sierpień 2015      Artur Łoboda
Z dwu wierszy 
17 sierpień 2020      Zygmunt Jan Prusiński
Debata przed Pałacem Namiestnikowskim w Warszawie 
10 kwiecień 2010      Zygmunt Jan Prusiński
Rząd wszystko może... 
31 październik 2020     
Wcześniej robiono to w KL Auschwitz -Birkenau  
5 kwiecień 2021      prafalko

 
 

How Today's Conservatism Lost Touch with Reality


Worldview
How Today's Conservatism Lost Touch with Reality
By Fareed Zakaria Thursday, June 16, 2011

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2077943,00.html#ixzz1QnRywOBv

• "Conservatism is true." That's what George Will told me when I interviewed him as an eager student many years ago. His formulation might have been a touch arrogant, but Will's basic point was intelligent. Conservatism, he explained, was rooted in reality. Unlike the abstract theories of Marxism and socialism, it started not from an imagined society but from the world as it actually exists. From Aristotle to Edmund Burke, the greatest conservative thinkers have said that to change societies, one must understand them, accept them as they are and help them evolve.
Watching this election campaign, one wonders what has happened to that tradition. Conservatives now espouse ideas drawn from abstract principles with little regard to the realities of America's present or past. This is a tragedy, because conservatism has an important role to play in modernizing the U.S. (See "The Heart of Conservative Values: Not Where It Used to Be?")
Consider the debates over the economy. The Republican prescription is to cut taxes and slash government spending — then things will bounce back. Now, I would like to see lower rates in the context of tax simplification and reform, but what is the evidence that tax cuts are the best path to revive the U.S. economy? Taxes — federal and state combined — as a percentage of GDP are at their lowest level since 1950. The U.S. is among the lowest taxed of the big industrial economies. So the case that America is grinding to a halt because of high taxation is not based on facts but is simply a theoretical assertion. The rich countries that are in the best shape right now, with strong growth and low unemployment, are ones like Germany and Denmark, neither one characterized by low taxes.
Many Republican businessmen have told me that the Obama Administration is the most hostile to business in 50 years. Really? More than that of Richard Nixon, who presided over tax rates that reached 70%, regulations that spanned whole industries, and who actually instituted price and wage controls?
In fact, right now any discussion of government involvement in the economy — even to build vital infrastructure — is impossible because it is a cardinal tenet of the new conservatism that such involvement is always and forever bad. Meanwhile, across the globe, the world's fastest-growing economy, China, has managed to use government involvement to create growth and jobs for three decades. From Singapore to South Korea to Germany to Canada, evidence abounds that some strategic actions by the government can act as catalysts for free-market growth. (See a dozen Republicans who could be the next President.)
Of course, American history suggests that as well. In the 1950s, '60s and '70s, the U.S. government made massive investments in science and technology, in state universities and in infant industries. It built infrastructure that was the envy of the rest of the world. Those investments triggered two generations of economic growth and put the U.S. on top of the world of technology and innovation.
But that history has been forgotten. When considering health care, for example, Republicans confidently assert that their ideas will lower costs, when we simply do not have much evidence for this. What we do know is that of the world's richest countries, the U.S. has by far the greatest involvement of free markets and the private sector in health care. It also consumes the largest share of GDP, with no significant gains in health on any measurable outcome. We need more market mechanisms to cut medical costs, but Republicans don't bother to study existing health care systems anywhere else in the world. They resemble the old Marxists, who refused to look around at actual experience. "I know it works in practice," the old saw goes, "but does it work in theory?" (See "When GOP Presidential Candidates Skip, They Quickly Stumble.")
Conservatives used to be the ones with heads firmly based in reality. Their reforms were powerful because they used the market, streamlined government and empowered individuals. Their effects were large-scale and important: think of the reform of the tax code in the 1980s, for example, which was spearheaded by conservatives. Today conservatives shy away from the sensible ideas of the Bowles-Simpson commission on deficit reduction because those ideas are too deeply rooted in, well, reality. Does anyone think we are really going to get federal spending to the level it was at under Calvin Coolidge, as Paul Ryan's plan assumes? Does anyone think we will deport 11 million people?
We need conservative ideas to modernize the U.S. economy and reform American government. But what we have instead are policies that don't reform but just cut and starve government — a strategy that pays little attention to history or best practices from around the world and is based instead on a theory. It turns out that conservatives are the woolly-headed professors after all.

2 lipiec 2011

przysłał ICP 

  

Komentarze

  

Archiwum

Biznesmeni - oszuści pod kluczem
sierpień 27, 2002
IAR
A comment to the 4-th Conference “Dialogue of Civilizations” at Rhodes, Sept. 27-30, 2006
październik 16, 2006
Marek Glogoczowski
Retrospekcja, czyli rzecz o...
maj 2, 2006
Marek Olżyński
Kanty Okrągłego Stołu
czerwiec 28, 2003
Adam Sandauer
Kalisz zawiadomi prokuraturę o przecieku ws. ordynatora
luty 24, 2007
25 razy o Wałęsie (1)
sierpień 16, 2005
Artur Łoboda
TEZY do dyskusji w ramach Programu "Polska 2005" ? komentarz 1
lipiec 18, 2005
J.Ś.
I PO ZIMAKU...
marzec 2, 2005
31 000 dni JPII
maj 26, 2007
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
"Zaufaj mediom", czyli :
Czy Jacek Cygan to cygan

grudzień 9, 2003
Artur Łoboda
Jak Amerykanie Tracą Wolność
styczeń 22, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Ekstrawagancja na prawicy
wrzesień 4, 2006
Adam T. Witczak
Handel ludzką naiwnością
maj 24, 2007
Kim są iraccy powstańcy?
lipiec 17, 2006
Matthieu Guidere i Peter Harling
Blef o trzeciej instancji sądowej
styczeń 4, 2006
Andrzej Grabowski
Wpisywanie informacji do encyklopedii Wikipedia
styczeń 10, 2008
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Jakie ma intencje "elita przywódcza świata"
wrzesień 16, 2005
Marek Głogoczowski
W Sejmie wrze, rolnicy czekają PAP
grudzień 7, 2002
PAP
"Tarcza" nie jest warta odnowy Zimnej Wojny USA z Rosją
lipiec 27, 2008
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Armia izraelska zburzyła kwaterę Arafata
wrzesień 21, 2002
AFP
 


Kontakt

Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2023 Polskie Niezależne Media