Ogłoszony w 2020 roku apel 33 lekarzy z całego świata należących do sojuszu World Doctors Alliance, w którym ostrzegają przed ryzykiem związanym z nowymi eksperymentalnymi szczepionkami na Covid-19, wyjaśniają na jakiej zasadzie one działają i co dokładnie czyni je tak niebezpiecznymi.

Braun przesłuchiwał Szumowskiego w Sądzie

Ostatni mit (o polityce sowieckiej)

Wielkie pytania o 9/11

Strona poświęcona analizie wydarzeń z 11 września 2001

Szczepionka na covid ma służyć genetycznej mutacji ludzkości

Dr. Andrew Kaufman Responds To Reuters Fact Check on COVID-19 Vaccine Genetically Modifying Humans

In the first interview the two discussed the coronavirus, they covered testing and they covered the vaccine. The video was quickly approaching 100k views but YouTube removed the video after only a couple days. This video will likely be taken down as well, because it does not conform to the establishment's narrative.

Not only did YouTube remove the previous video, Reuters, which is a massive international news publication that news sites from all over the world obtain their talking points from, published a fact checking report attempting to debunk Dr. Kaufman's claims that the new COVID-19 DNA vaccine would genetically modify humans. In this must see report, Dr Kaufman responds to the Reuters ‘fact checking’ report.

Po tych szczepionkach 12-15 letnie dzieci umierają na krwotoki mózgu, zawały serca, niewydolność serca

Przedsiębiorstwo holokaust

Telewizyjny wywiad z Normanem Finkelsteinem

Folksdojcz

Fantastyczny zespół - poruszający ważne problemy społeczne stworzył bardzo dosadną piosenkę, będącą miksem wywiadu telewizyjnego z śpiewem zespołu.

Kolędowanie w Alternatywie dla Niemiec

Jak to jest z kowidem na Florydzie?

Przemoc seksualna wobec dzieci

Organizacje pedofilskie na najwyższych szczeblach władzy

W pierwszej kolejności powinno zostać ustalone, kto za to odpowie?

Niektórzy mówią, że jest to wirus, który ma zlikwidować Christmas w Wielkiej Brytanii oraz w całej Europie – unieruchomić kraj w momencie, kiedy chrześcijanie obchodzą jedno z dwóch najważniejszych świąt w ciągu roku

Prawdziwym powodem, dla którego rząd chce, abyście co 3 miesiące otrzymywali booster COVID-19 jest to, że u zaszczepionych rozwija się nowa forma AIDS

więcej ->

Is Poland America's donkey or could it become NATO's horse?

May 8th 2003
From The Economist print edition

Polish-American diplomacy may be deepening the divisions in Europe-or paving the way to a post-Iraq rapprochement

WHEN Donald Rumsfeld, America's defence secretary, made his quip about "new Europe", the concept looked more like a diplomatic crutch than a geopolitical reality. When most of the countries he had in mind signed on the dotted line in support of America's stance on Iraq, Jacques Chirac, France's president, chastised them like naughty adolescents. Now the new Europeansat least, quite a few of themseem to be putting their troops, as well as their land and airspace, where their mouths were. On the face of it, that might deepen Europe's divisions. Or it might help spur greater NATO involvement in Iraq and serve to heal those divisions.

The Poles are the vanguard of these Atlanticist whipper-snappers. Poland, which joined NATO in 1999 and is easily the beefiest (at least in population and area) of those set to join the EU next year, sent around 200 troops to fight in Iraq. A little improbably, it is now set to oversee one of the four sectors into which the Americans seem likely to divide the conquered country. The idea was floated last week when Jerzy Szmajdzinski, Poland's defence minister, visited Mr Rumsfeld in Washington. The Poles would like the UN to pass a new Iraqi resolution to bless the operation, but would probably go in without one—so long as America and others agree to pay.

Alexander Kwasniewski, Poland's president, will have some explaining to do when he gets together with Gerhard Schröder, Germany's chancellor, and Mr Chirac, in the Polish city of Wroclaw on May 9th, for what ought to have been a bridge-rebuilding mini-summit. It had begun to seem possible that Germany might take part in the peacekeeping effort, despite concerns that doing so might lend retrospective approval to the war itself. Peter Struck, Germany's defence minister, has been fence-mending in Washington.

But he says he found out that German troops might soon serve in Iraq, conceivably under Polish command, only when he heard it on the news; one of several tentative plans is to deploy a joint Polish-Danish-German force, now based in Szczezin, in Iraq. Germany has keenly sponsored Polish membership of both NATO and the EU, and some Germans resent the Poles' contrarian and (as they see it) hubristic behaviour over Iraq. A commentator in a leading German newspaper this week describes Poland as America's "Trojan donkey". Another calls the Poles "insolent".

Several other new Europeans have flirted with America over Iraq, with a view to cosier relations. For example, Romania and Bulgaria let their bases be used as staging posts. Both are in line to join NATO; and both are keen for America to set up new permanent bases on their territory. In particular, they would like to be beneficiaries of a reorganisation of American bases in Europe, which may involve closing some in Germany and creating new ones further east, whatever Russia's moans.

There are some good strategic reasons for such a move. With the cold war over, it makes sense to concentrate American power nearer the Middle East and Central Asia, as well as the Balkans. General James Jones, the American commander in Europe, prefers lighter, expeditionary deployments to hulking installations with thousands of dependants (around 80,000 in Germany, along with the 71,000 troops still based there). Some Germans resent the Americans anyway, and Germany is expensive, though so is moving. For all that, some American congressmen see this revision of America's military posture as punishment for Germany's supposed perfidy over Iraq and a reward for its eastern neighbours' loyalty.

Watch it, you oldies
All this looks bad for some "old" Europeans. Every offer of support from newcomers (as well as from oldies such as Spaniards, Italians and Danes) for Iraq's reconstruction helps make the American-led campaign seem more than just a quixotic Anglo-Saxon crusade and serves to isolate the rejectionists, some of whom are concluding that the Americans are trying to divide and rule (or at least marginalise) the Europeans. An American pull-out from Germany would be a huge political snub to an old ally, and cost thousands of jobs.

In fact, a lot of the Americans are likely to stay put (at Ramstein air base, for instance). And Poland's adventure in Iraq could, in the end, help heal the divisions within Europe, and between Europe and America, rather than exacerbate them.

Germany, far more than France, is currently trying to scramble off the hook on which its pre-war diplomacy over Iraq landed it. And America, while pleased that the Poles and others are offering to lend a hand in Iraq, would prefer to have a more substantial, multilateral imprimatur for their endeavours. Ideally, if the terms suited, it would come from the UN.

But there are other possibilities. Poland and the other new Europeans could help both sides out by drawing other NATO countries in. It is understandable, given their country's history, that the Poles are enjoying punching above their weight and being fęted by President George Bush (who may visit them soon) and Mr Rumsfeld. At the same time, they are already stressing that they want European countries to share the burden. The 1,500-2,200 Polish soldiers that are being talked about for Iraq are hardly enough for the job.

In due course that may mean a NATO involvement in Iraq. If the Poles were to request NATO's help, some fellow members might be more accommodating than they would be to a direct American request. The Poles, who care about NATO and America's commitment to it more than some other members, would like to prove to the Americans that NATO still has its uses, despite recent form. Something similar has happened in Afghanistan, where NATO has eventually assumed a big role. So Poland may yet turn out to be NATO's Trojan horse rather than America's donkey.

12 maj 2003

przesłała Elżbieta

Dodaj komentarz

Eminem: Mosh "(...)No more blood for oil"
grudzień 16, 2004

Po 5 lat za dwie kradzieże
kwiecień 13, 2008
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia

Korporacyjna maszyna wojenna stosuje terror
wrzesień 3, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Bush nie chce zakazu tortur
październik 6, 2005
PAP

Kondotierzy rewolucji
grudzień 8, 2004
przesłała Elżbieta Gawlas

Konstytucja i Sprawa Nadzoru w USA
październik 26, 2005
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Reformy bez głowy
grudzień 21, 2003
przesłała Elżbieta

Dzwony biją nie dla Polaków!
marzec 15, 2007
ZYGMUNT JAN PRUSIŃSKI

Jak nie kijem to pałą.
Pomysł kolejnego podatku dla turystów
sierpień 28, 2003
Artur Łoboda

Tempora, leges i mores
grudzień 4, 2006
Stanisław Michalkiewicz

Komu(ch) bije w dzwon
październik 18, 2005
Marek Olżyński, Polska Północna

Strach przed Polakami
luty 7, 2003
http://www.rzeczpospolita.pl/

Teraz wiadomo po co Ameryce potrzebna Polska i rakiety na jej terytorium
luty 9, 2007
PAP

Rosja ma nową ideę
listopad 30, 2007
Igor Panarin

Praca - dobro luksusowe ?
czerwiec 26, 2003
Artur Kowalski

Komitet Incjatywy Ustawodawczej na rzecz ustawy o Rzeczniku Pacjenta
listopad 24, 2003

Polska Państwem Prawa ?
kwiecień 7, 2003
dr Adam Sandauer

Osiągnięto globalne porozumienie handlowe w Genewie
sierpień 2, 2004

Jews killed Jews to create the state of Israel
czerwiec 24, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski

Hausner musi boleć
luty 1, 2004
Adrian Dudkiewicz

więcej ->

Kontakt

Is Poland America's donkey or could it become NATO's horse?

Fundacja Promocji Kultury Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Polskie Niezależne Media

Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Polskie Niezależne Media