To właśnie mega-korporacje i mega-miliarderzy — (...) są głównymi zwolennikami “oddolnego” ruchu dekarbonizacji — od Szwecji przez Niemcy po USA i dalej.

TAK SIĘ BAWIĄ UKRAIŃCY - KORUPCJA źródłem BOGACTWA?

Bardzo drogie auta, prywatne odrzutowce, jachty, helikoptery i nieruchomości w luksusowych europejskich destynacjach, przemyt w walizkach kilkunastu lub kilkudziesięciu milionów dolarów i ponad miliona euro tak bawią się ukraińskie elity.

Wykład Ernsta Wolffa na temat obecnego kryzysu

Jak tlenek grafenu reaguje w organizmie

Przez szczepionkę dostaje się do tkanek i "mnoży się", tworząc sieć przewodzącą w całym ciele, a następnie...

CZY ROZUMIESZ SKĄD ZAMIESZKI I PRÓBA WYWOŁANIA WOJNY DOMOWEJ W USA?

nie podejmuje żadnych interwencji w stosunku do osobników kierujących takimi organizacjami jak „Antifa” i Black Lives Matter – czyli George Sorosowi, Billowi Gates czy Amerykański wirusolog i członek powołanej przez administrację Donalda Trumpa grupy zadaniowej ds. epidemii COVID-19 Anthony Fauci – który jest siłą napędową dla Gatesa i Sorosa w sparawie Covid-19 i szczepionek. – to wszystko, zaprzecza opisom powyższego artykułu. Myślę że czas pokaże co dalej…

Rząd Stanów Zjednoczonych CELOWO niszczy żywność amerykańskich Farmerów i stymuluje kryzys zaopatrzenia w żywność

Jakiś czas temu na oficjalnej stronie ONZ ukazał się artykuł "Korzyści z głodu na świecie". Wprawdzie szybko go usunięto, lecz nadal jest dostępny w internetowych archiwach

Tego preparatu nie można nazywać szczepionką. Nazywam to konstruktem mRNA, rekombinowanym RNA, preparatem, który jest dziełem inżynierii genetycznej.

Prof. zw. dr hab. Roman Zieliński “O szczepionce genetycznej Pfizera i testach PCR”

Czy to broń mikrofalowa spowodowała poważne oparzenia i obrażenia protestujących w Canberze w Australii?

Na straży wolności: Goldman Sachs

Gerald Celente i John Stossel rozmawiają z sędzią Napolitano o różnych, nie do końca jasnych powiązaniach, między amerykańskimi bankami i rządem USA. Największe podejrzenia budzi bank Goldman Sachs, który ma dziwną nadreprezentację we władzach rządowych. Dla przypomnienia, dodam, że pracownikiem tego banku jest były premier RP, Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, a bank był zamieszany w spekulacje na złotówce.

Tu jest Polska, a nie Polin! Protest pod Sejmem!

Protest przeciwko świecy chanukowej pod Sejmem w Warszawie.

więcej ->

Is Poland America's donkey or could it become NATO's horse?

May 8th 2003
From The Economist print edition

Polish-American diplomacy may be deepening the divisions in Europe-or paving the way to a post-Iraq rapprochement

WHEN Donald Rumsfeld, America's defence secretary, made his quip about "new Europe", the concept looked more like a diplomatic crutch than a geopolitical reality. When most of the countries he had in mind signed on the dotted line in support of America's stance on Iraq, Jacques Chirac, France's president, chastised them like naughty adolescents. Now the new Europeansat least, quite a few of themseem to be putting their troops, as well as their land and airspace, where their mouths were. On the face of it, that might deepen Europe's divisions. Or it might help spur greater NATO involvement in Iraq and serve to heal those divisions.

The Poles are the vanguard of these Atlanticist whipper-snappers. Poland, which joined NATO in 1999 and is easily the beefiest (at least in population and area) of those set to join the EU next year, sent around 200 troops to fight in Iraq. A little improbably, it is now set to oversee one of the four sectors into which the Americans seem likely to divide the conquered country. The idea was floated last week when Jerzy Szmajdzinski, Poland's defence minister, visited Mr Rumsfeld in Washington. The Poles would like the UN to pass a new Iraqi resolution to bless the operation, but would probably go in without one—so long as America and others agree to pay.

Alexander Kwasniewski, Poland's president, will have some explaining to do when he gets together with Gerhard Schröder, Germany's chancellor, and Mr Chirac, in the Polish city of Wroclaw on May 9th, for what ought to have been a bridge-rebuilding mini-summit. It had begun to seem possible that Germany might take part in the peacekeeping effort, despite concerns that doing so might lend retrospective approval to the war itself. Peter Struck, Germany's defence minister, has been fence-mending in Washington.

But he says he found out that German troops might soon serve in Iraq, conceivably under Polish command, only when he heard it on the news; one of several tentative plans is to deploy a joint Polish-Danish-German force, now based in Szczezin, in Iraq. Germany has keenly sponsored Polish membership of both NATO and the EU, and some Germans resent the Poles' contrarian and (as they see it) hubristic behaviour over Iraq. A commentator in a leading German newspaper this week describes Poland as America's "Trojan donkey". Another calls the Poles "insolent".

Several other new Europeans have flirted with America over Iraq, with a view to cosier relations. For example, Romania and Bulgaria let their bases be used as staging posts. Both are in line to join NATO; and both are keen for America to set up new permanent bases on their territory. In particular, they would like to be beneficiaries of a reorganisation of American bases in Europe, which may involve closing some in Germany and creating new ones further east, whatever Russia's moans.

There are some good strategic reasons for such a move. With the cold war over, it makes sense to concentrate American power nearer the Middle East and Central Asia, as well as the Balkans. General James Jones, the American commander in Europe, prefers lighter, expeditionary deployments to hulking installations with thousands of dependants (around 80,000 in Germany, along with the 71,000 troops still based there). Some Germans resent the Americans anyway, and Germany is expensive, though so is moving. For all that, some American congressmen see this revision of America's military posture as punishment for Germany's supposed perfidy over Iraq and a reward for its eastern neighbours' loyalty.

Watch it, you oldies
All this looks bad for some "old" Europeans. Every offer of support from newcomers (as well as from oldies such as Spaniards, Italians and Danes) for Iraq's reconstruction helps make the American-led campaign seem more than just a quixotic Anglo-Saxon crusade and serves to isolate the rejectionists, some of whom are concluding that the Americans are trying to divide and rule (or at least marginalise) the Europeans. An American pull-out from Germany would be a huge political snub to an old ally, and cost thousands of jobs.

In fact, a lot of the Americans are likely to stay put (at Ramstein air base, for instance). And Poland's adventure in Iraq could, in the end, help heal the divisions within Europe, and between Europe and America, rather than exacerbate them.

Germany, far more than France, is currently trying to scramble off the hook on which its pre-war diplomacy over Iraq landed it. And America, while pleased that the Poles and others are offering to lend a hand in Iraq, would prefer to have a more substantial, multilateral imprimatur for their endeavours. Ideally, if the terms suited, it would come from the UN.

But there are other possibilities. Poland and the other new Europeans could help both sides out by drawing other NATO countries in. It is understandable, given their country's history, that the Poles are enjoying punching above their weight and being fęted by President George Bush (who may visit them soon) and Mr Rumsfeld. At the same time, they are already stressing that they want European countries to share the burden. The 1,500-2,200 Polish soldiers that are being talked about for Iraq are hardly enough for the job.

In due course that may mean a NATO involvement in Iraq. If the Poles were to request NATO's help, some fellow members might be more accommodating than they would be to a direct American request. The Poles, who care about NATO and America's commitment to it more than some other members, would like to prove to the Americans that NATO still has its uses, despite recent form. Something similar has happened in Afghanistan, where NATO has eventually assumed a big role. So Poland may yet turn out to be NATO's Trojan horse rather than America's donkey.

12 maj 2003

przesłała Elżbieta

Dodaj komentarz

22 lipiec
lipiec 23, 2003
Piotr Szubarczyk

Bilans kosztów członkostwa Polski w UE
lipiec 2, 2006
Dariusz Kosiur

Profesor Poznański w Toronto
luty 6, 2005

Analny śpiewak
listopad 14, 2004
Mirosław Naleziński

Wiara naszych przodków
grudzień 15, 2005
Artur Łoboda

EBOR gotów wziąć udział w prywatyzacji G-8
wrzesień 17, 2002
PAP

Nie lękajcie się Mamona?
kwiecień 11, 2005
Marek Głogoczowski

Niektóre wiadomości
czerwiec 6, 2008
.

Szlifowanie kamienia wedle starego wzoru
wrzesień 3, 2007
Zygmunt Jan Prusiński

Seks dobry na wszystko
sierpień 21, 2007
Krystyna Boińska

Najpierw hitlerowcy, teraz lichwiarze
styczeń 20, 2004

Podpowied?
czerwiec 16, 2004

Sprawa bezprawia prawa, czyli samo zło
luty 28, 2006
Marek Olżyński

Odwrócone role
czerwiec 11, 2008
Artur Łoboda

Exit From Iraq Should Be Through Iran
maj 31, 2007
William E. Odom

5 kłamstw na temat sytuacji w Strefie Gazy
styczeń 6, 2009
AWT

Prawda podobno wyzwala
październik 17, 2006
PAP

Mediokracja.
styczeń 22, 2007
tezlav von roya

Co z Brakiem, mężem Picassa?
czerwiec 18, 2005
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia

"Trzech tenorów", dwóch idiotów
marzec 21, 2003
Artur Łoboda

więcej ->

Kontakt

Is Poland America's donkey or could it become NATO's horse?

Fundacja Promocji Kultury Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Polskie Niezależne Media

Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Polskie Niezależne Media