From Blagovesta Doncheva – Bulgaria
|I. Re your – alas, our – 11th of September
I was of those who celebrated the 11.09. CELEBRATED. I repeat it to clear away all possible doubts I have written just that. We CELEBRATED - as many people round the world DID. We gathered in the afternoon of that same day in a cafe and drunk a cup of coffee each – we were too poor to allow ourselves something more. (Today we are even poorer – too poor to allow ourselves even entering a cafe… A boring detail, excuse me.) It was a wonderful afternoon – so sunny, so calm – as the first sunny day after a long ugly storm. I won’t forget that feeling of freedom – the restored ability to breathe freely again – as if an enormous pressure has been taken off our chests after a very long time. We sat there round an outside table basking in the sun, not talking, simply smiling quietly to one another, handshaking with other people who came to our table with their joyous "Congratulations!” Yes, we all did that – congratulating one another as if that day were a national holiday – a very meaningful international holiday. At that moment we could not imagine that it was in fact the Bloody Beginning of the Bloody Return to the Dark Ages in the XXI-st Century… We were like slightly drunk persons – drunk from that newly found freedom to breathe again after more than ten years. And, N.B.! - even on that Day of Emotions one of us dared to say: “It is impossible … THEY have done it themselves.” We quickly hushed her – we did not want to be rational yet… children-like, we wanted to elongate that newly found ability to notice and enjoy a nice day - although we all felt the stirring chilly warnings deep inside...
But the 12th of September was the Day of Rational Thinking. And then, with that heavy burden again back in our hearts we called one another and arranged another meeting – this time the Meeting of Logically Thinking Adults, not a group of smiling children. We met in the same cafe, so forlorn, so sad, so full of horrifying forebodings. Again there was no need to talk. We sat there silently, even not daring to look one another in the eyes fearing we can see the horror we felt in the eyes of the others...
I repeat: we K-N-E-W it was an inside job on the next day of 11th of September. Not on the basis of the facts you have unraveled since then but by the simple force of the simple LOGICAL THINKING. And we are VERY ORDINARY PEOPLE. Yes, ordinary people but well informed. We had already read about Pearl Harbor. The Tonkin Bay. The US Liberty – and especially Berlin's Reichstag (now nobody remembers Georgi Dimitrov – but we do, he was one of us, he was a Bulgarian – how could we forget him?) And not only this. Just about that time we were actively engaged in unraveling the manufactured LIES of CIA think-tanks about the SOVIET UNION and STALIN. So, we K-N-E-W. On the 12th of September we KNEW. And when the Truth Movement appeared (at last!) and began to stir I read some of the facts they gathered, satisfied myself that they ALL proved what we KNEW, and stopped following their efforts – what for? We are well educated Slavs, not a heap of US citizens deliberately amputated of the ability to think – to ask questions and find answers – in the US schools. (Now the same is being done in our Bulgarian schools with our Bulgarian children…) But in Socialist Bulgaria my generation had been DELIBERATELY taught to THINK – to ANALYZE – to OBSERVE and MAKE CONCLUSIONS! So, I am neither 1/ one of the purposefully brainwashed US citizens to be explained at length that sun was rising in the East (and that sun” and “East” are not things you can buy in the neighboring mall), nor 2/ a comfortably established OFFICIAL “dissident” like your Chomsky The Great Lion Heart. So much for the Beginning of the End for our Planet – 11th of September 2001.
II. Re your Chomsky The Great Lion Heart
I personally also passed through the stage of admiring Chomsky. I have translated a book and long articles by him into Bulgarian (And – of course – I very often stumbled on his notorious sentences almost every third of which started at the beginning of a page and ended almost at its bottom. I had to cut them into several independent sentences to make his writing understandable! Even at that early stage I used to ask myself for whom he was writing. Definitely not for an ordinary reader, I told myself. Now I suspect that one of the reasons he was approved for an OFFICIAL “dissident” might be the fact that his writings were apparently addressed to a narrow university and scholarly elite that can NEVER get dangerous and turn into a “Threat to the National Security of the USA”. (I hope I have quoted rightly that notorious BLOOD-DRIPPING, CORPSE-SMELLING phrase…) And then I came across worrying things – small things I kicked back and don’t remember but they stayed there and kept sending red signals.
Till YUGOSLAVIA and 24th of March 1999.
24th of March is a religious holiday for us, the Orthodox Slavs – Annunciation. And also my Name Day: translated, my name is Annuncia. Well, I have no Name Day anymore – it was bombed away in 1999. But still I must be regarded as a very lucky person: I have lost a Name Day, but I am alive and whole in difference to the butchered Serbs – Iraqi – Afghans – Pakistani - Palestinians - African people - Haiti people – and so on and so forth to the End of the World…
On 24th of March 1999 USA and EU + Canada started bombing YUGOSLAVIAN children and elderly, hospitals and churches, TV stations and embassies, plants and houses. Gum chewing IDIOTS installed in war planes started destroying a well-to-do country almost in the heart of Europe.
And what was the justifiable OFFICIAL reason for that MONSTROSITY?
That the President of YUGOSLAVIA – an intelligent leader of a country but definitely NOT a fighter – had managed to eat for breakfast 100,000+ Albanians (maybe together with their cows, pigs and lice. I don’t know. CIA wouldn’t say.) Mind – we are talking about an European country with highly educated population and century long history of culture. We are NOT talking about an African tribe from the 15th century - or some century BC. Not well worked out reason – very bad CIA job indeed.
Don’t worry – it is only a preamble. I haven’t forgotten I am writing about your Chomsky The Great Lion Heart.
One day I received a copy of his newest book on still the newest USA war enterprise - in EUROPE this time - and an offer to translate it into Bulgarian and publish it here. So I started reading – I had already got a glimpse of his position on the USA and EU + Canada aggression on YUGOSLAVIA but I had chosen not to believe - in homage to Chomsky still The Great for me. But – here it was in his book staring at me: Milosevic the Man-Eater (the Monster, The Vampire, John the Ripper, etc.) had eaten/killed/butchered/fried at stakes, boiled in huge cauldrons, etc. thousands and thousands and thousands of poor, innocent, white clothed, angel-like Albanians – WAW! Aw! W! I wrote to him asking him HOW DID HE KNOW. You can’t imagine his answer – you simply can’t! He wrote back that he has read it in the classified (CIA!!!) DOCUMENTS!!! I swear that is just what he wrote! No joke. No mistake. He wrote that surely without batting an eye. A pause – to give you time to laugh hilariously or shed a bitter tear. I didn’t do either. I never wrote to him again. Since that day for me your Chomsky The Great Lion Heart is stone dead. He does NOT exist in my world. But you have chosen to let him linger in your worlds. Your choice. And when you began discussing him in, approximately, the line of “to be or not to be” – i.e. is he Great? Or Shit? Maybe he is not great but only a Lion? Or very likely a governmental OFFICIAL “dissident” licking governmental policy makers' ASSES 24 hours per day? – I feel like screaming. But I can’t do that because I live in a crowded city not in the woods (what a pity!). Still, periodically you most obstinately devote yourselves on endless - on the surface aimless - discussions of the "Good Man" – excuse me, the “Very Kind Man” (now the quote is right, isn’t it, dear Joselyn? By the way, we are NOT discussing his character here and eventually appetite, but his political opinions and positions. Don’t worry, it is only a tiny detail – and you’re not to blame. It is your “education” system - or, more exactly, the total lack of it.)
I want to ask you all a question: aren’t there heaps of really troublesome subjects to discuss and think over? I wonder why exactly Mr. Shamir has started that time-losing, worthless discussion? Just when an USraeli nuclear war is looming at the horizon...
Some millions will die very soon in the horror of the nuclear mushrooms – but what are some millions for us to cry for them - at least?
Let’s instead discuss an US governmental servant.
Now do you understand why THEY need official “dissidents”? Look what good work both Chomsky and – alas! – Shamir have done for THEM!
--- On Thu, 7/24/08, Israel Shamir wrote:
> From: Israel Shamir
> Subject: [shamireaders] Chomsky responses
> To: "readers"
> Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008, 12:05 AM
> Responses to Israel Shamir's article
> Noam Chomsky and the 9/11 crusaders
> From James R. Hanson, Ohio
> Mr. Shamir:
> I have valued your E-mail messages for as many years as you have been
> sending them, and see you as exceptionally well-informed and balanced
> on the subject of Israel's relations with its neighbors. I have
> written letters to the editor on the subject, to the displeasure of
> local Jewish leaders, since a first letter in 1984. You have
> been one of my major guides. I was first concerned to
> write to protest the coverup of the USS Liberty attack by
> Israeli planes and ships, for which I took Israel to task
> until I came to the belief that they had played their usual
> role, doing dirty work for the United States.
> I've seen a video of Noam Chomsky trying not to talk
> about 9/11 by saying it was nothing of importance, of which
> I made a transcript. I know Kevin Barrett personally and admire him
> as a man of virtue and a patriotic American. Yes, those who refuse to
> see that the 9/11 attacks were a U.S. project, necessarily with the
> cooperation of Israel and Saudi Arabia, are in effect "the enemy," as
> you say. Those of us who call it a "false flag"
> attack are considered incipient terrorists who expect
> themselves to be among the first to fill the detention
> centers being arranged for us by the Bush administration
> and its larcenous friends at Halliburton, if we don't
> shut up, or even if we do.
> Why should we go so far as to consider unbelievers
> "the enemy"?
> We deal with them as normally as we can, which requires effort.
> Members of families have differing beliefs on the subject, which
> causes detraction from family harmony. Typically they want us to try
> not to take our ideas so seriously. If one sees a train coming
> because of better vision or better hearing, or a more advantageous
> viewpoint, he warns people on the track to get out of the way. In
> this case, they throw rocks and tell us not to spoil their
> The idea is that we have studied the facts and can come to
> no other conclusion, any more than you could if you were to examine
> the subject with curiosity and objectivity. I have just completed a
> study of the Pentagon event which I find clearly reveals U.S. military
> complicity. It is 36 pages, in effect an outline for a book. There
> is no doubt. My Jewish friends, with one exception, wonder if I have
> become an anti-Semite in my advanced years. This country, step by
> step, has been ruined under the Bush administration for the
> simple reason that the media looks away, so that the 9/11
> truth that would send George W. Bush and company to prison
> cannot be used against him. Both of his elections were
> rigged, as we who live in Columbus, Ohio are aware, where
> the tally came out in his favor despite well-proven
> machinations, currently under review in a new action at law
> here. He is not truly president, but a usurper, one with no
> conscience who has repeatedly and reliably proven his
> If the truth of 9/11 had come out in 2002, there would have been no
> invasion of Afghanistan, no Iraq war, none of the arrogant, purposely
> self-destructive acts of government that have occurred. The economy
> is about to fall apart, with no visible bottom, giving Bush the
> environment he needs to use National Security Presidential Directive
> 51 to declare martial law and cancel the November election. There
> is much more to it than this. In any year that the truth
> had been given space in the New York Times, he could have
> been stopped. Now it's too late. The scoffers, whom
> you have joined, to my disappointment, can shortly declare
> victory. Their prize is a ruined nation with a broken
> military and a well-deserved reputation in the world as a
> monster of calamity and death. This is the country for
> which I avidly went to war in World War II. I, and all
> other veterans of that war or any of the other devised
> conflicts since then, are betrayed. We fly the flag for a
> past era, not the present, other than as a symbol of what
> appears to be a vain hope.
> You must forgive Kevin Barrett if he was exasperated with
> Noam Chomsky. So am I. If you saw the video I did (of
> which I made a transcript), it would be clear to you that Chomsky
> knows the truth, which makes him an officer in the movement to destroy
> America. America. I know we're naive, but we thought it was an
> excellent idea. Kevin has sacrificed a normal life to fight the true
> war for his country, for no profit and even less future. Kevin knows
> what the result will be, as the know-nothing bloc lies in
> his way, transfixed by the tell-nothing media. It's a
> personal thing for any patriot.
> You are now a declared part of that bloc, and to my
> chagrin, a strong voice in it--one that is well aware of
> the storm of speaking out against a majority and the
> "slings and arrows of outrageous fortune." You
> have always been one to go a layer deeper than the rest to found your
> beliefs. You should come down to our layer on this one.
> I still trust your integrity, which is why I write this.
> Because of your situation and your relationships there is a
> strong pull for you not to break away from the nay-sayers,
> the know-nothings, see-nothings, hear nothings, speak
> nothings who cower behind the media wall that has been
> provided for their comfort.
> Chomsky has been forced to choose, and he steps behind the
> wall. I understand your position as similar. You have
> dedicated your life and your personal well-being to
> bringing out the truth of Zionism, a voice badly needed;
> yet if you were to speak out to seriously question the 9/11
> event you feel that voice would be stilled by the loss of
> respect by those Jews, and non-Jews who have come to
> sympathize with the Jews, who have come to your side.
> Jews, by polling data, are the prominent element to
> ridicule the "9/11 truthers," if for no other
> reason, that Israel was the only nation benefitted by the
> attack, and is also one which would have a very painful
> experience if an honest investigation were conducted.
> Your choice to see and speak is not one to be considered as
> a choice with equal effects. It involves the destruction of
> the United States of America, killed with a lie, proof that
> instead of being a democratic republic that set a pattern
> for all the world, it is the ultimate proof, for all who
> consider it in the future, that it is an illusion, a
> pitiful attempt to appear to give the power of government
> to the people themselves. As in the wolf pack, the
> survivors will be the strong and the merciless. But no
> matter how well they succeed, they are still wolves, not
> human beings.
> Yours in earnest,
> James R. Hanson
> Attorney at Law, retired
> Columbus, Ohio
> Shamir responds:
> Dear James, I value your sincere words. Certainly the truth
> of 9/11 is more complicated than the government version; I
> have no doubt about it. But consider:
> If you were an extremely powerful Jew able to do 9/11, why
> would you attack Twin Towers? Would not you rather send 20
> Arab fanatics in full battle dress to massacre a
> kindergarten, a school, and eat hearts of American babies
> in live broadcast?
> And besides, my article is about something else. It is
> about Noam Chomsky who is entitled not to be abused
> whatever are his thoughts. Chomsky was not afraid to write
> foreword of Faurisson; he is afraid of nothing. But he has
> other fish to fry, and he fries it extremely well.
> Wishing you every success in unmasking the plotters,
> From Ken Freeland, Texas
> Dear Adam
> I must concur with Professor Zaidi, as well as Jim Petras,
> Jeff Blankfort and yes, Kevin Barrett, regarding the role
> played by Noam Chomsky -- that of Left Gatekeeper. In
> fact, I think one can almost the question to two issues
> when it comes to Left gatekeeping: Israel/Palestine (and
> most especially the question of Zionist control of US
> Middle East policy) and 9/11 (whether or not one accepts
> the government's Al-Queda conspiracy theory or not).
> Anyone who openly addresses these issues and at least asks
> intelligent questions is a gate opener, anyone who prates
> on dogmatically (like Chomsky) that Israel nothing but a US
> satrap and the official version of 9/11 will do just fine is
> a Left gatekeeper: one who uses his or her influence to
> discourage others from questioning this "received
> You live in Israel, Adam. Imagine how you would feel if the
> suicide bombing attributed to the Palestinian Arabs turned
> out to be an inside job, perpetrated by your own Jewish
> government. How would you feel then, when you heard people
> talking about the "stupendous martyrdoms" of the
> bombers? The 9/11 Truth movement (if which I am a
> longstanding member) has not been able to demonstrate
> conclusively (yet!) that 9/11 was an inside job (by our
> government) or a false flag operation (by a foreign
> government), but we have been able to demonstrate
> conclusively is the logical impossibility of the official
> explanation for the events of 9/11, as well as the fact
> that it was used to launch several Middle Eastern wars
> which did nothing to punish the alleged perpetrators (and
> everything to benefit Israel and the military-industrial
> Kevin Barrett is no mere 911 enthusiast. He is the news
> anchor on the up and coming noliesradio.org....an internet
> news service with a 9/11 truth focus. Moreover, his
> characterization of Chomsky is spot on, at least as far as
> his style and his Left gatekeeper role are concerned. Is
> Chomsky valueless then? That all depends. Chomsky can in
> fact be recommended to the neophyte academic who is just
> beginning to question his or her government. Because
> Chomsky is prolific in describing the evil of WHAT our
> government is doing with its foreign policy. The problem
> comes with his explanations of WHY the government is doing
> all these evil things: he is a virtual apologist for the
> Israel lobby, constantly dismissing its influence as
> negligible. But thousands of victims know otherwise. Here
> one should rip the volume of Chomsky away from the
> (advanced) inquiring reader, and give him something
> substantial: say, a book by Jim Petras or Jonathan Cook.
> When it comes to explaining US perfidy, there is more truth
> in one page of Petras than in two hours of Chomsky's
> droning delivery.
> I am sorry that you appear to lack empathy with Americans
> who have been had by our government with respect to 9/11.
> You apparently nurture a conspiracy theory of your own in
> which the plotters are enemies of mammon and its minions.
> We in the 9/11 Truth movement have good reason to suspect
> otherwise, but the evidence remains mostly circumstantial.
> But the truth will out one day. And when it does, Chomsky
> and those who defend his lack of intellectual rigor on this
> question will be deemed irrelevant, perhaps even to have
> been obstructionist. And I would like to ask you personally
> to answer the following question Adam, which must be
> answered by all those who, like you, invest the events of
> 9/11 with symbolic significance: if the perpetrators were
> so spirited about their attack on these symbols of American
> power, where is their signature? 9/11 Truth would have
> little basis to exist if the 9/11 plotters, whoever they
> were, gave a clear accounting of themselves,
> manifesto-style, to a terrorized world. But this is just
> what did NOT happen. You and those who believe similarly
> must ask yourself: why go through all the trouble of
> planning this "superb action" that shocked the
> world, and not have a thing to say about its purpose? Is
> that really how terrorists operate? Do they not commit
> acts of terrorism in the first place to publicize their
> cause? Is not taking credit for the act a sine qua non of
> all genuine terrorism? Why is it so absent here that the
> government had to manufacture "Bin Laden" videos
> that were afterwards proved to be fraudulent? These
> questions cannot be begged.
> I would encourage you to educate yourself to the
> scholarship of the 9/11 truth movement and familiarize
> yourselves with our essential arguments, instead of glibly
> dissing them. Perhaps start out with Dr. David Ray
> Griffin's classic study and proceed from there. We
> need scientific analysis here, Adam, not rhetoric.
> Focusing on the style of some of the players here has
> distracted you from the substance. As one tomato said to
> the other tomato: you're falling behind: time to
> Ken Freeland
> Shamir replies:
> Dear Ken, I wrote <
> about possibility of the Palestinian terrorist attacks
> being orchestrated by Israeli security forces. Yes, it is
> possible. But only minor attacks. Airplane hijacks etc are
> too tricky. They may allow something to happen; but to
> organize from scratch is another thing altogether. I fully
> agree with you that the government version is unacceptable,
> and I support your right to search for what actually
> happened. But equally I support Noam Chomsky's right to
> stay away from this controversy. If you and I can go beyond
> Noam, it is only because Noam secured a territory of
> discourse for our advance. As for Left Gatekeepers: this
> may refer only to people who actually block our ideas to go
> through, people who actually fight against us. None of these
> refers to Noam Chomsky, and I find him innocent of this
> From Richard Wilcox, Tokyo
> Dear Israel,
> I got my radical education from Chomsky in the 1990s (yes,
> that recently) through the Boulder, Colorado, Alternative
> Radio audio archives produced by David Barsamian. I recall
> one of the best interviews was titled "The US Economic
> System: Robbing People Blind." That interview could
> take place today without batting an eyelash. Of course,
> Chomsky does not target the Federal Reserve or
> International Jewry, so that is where he draws the line,
> but you could learn something from the man. In recent years
> I went of Chomsky once I learned of the power of the Israel
> Lobby and the flaws in his logic on that topic. I once
> prompted Barsamian to interview Blankfort but I think it
> would be a cold day in H before that would happen. By the
> way, I noticed another top Jewish political critic, Michel
> Chossudovsky also affirms the idea of Israel as the US
> pitbull to carry out "Washington's" orders in
> the Middle East. This thesis crumbles on thorough
> examination (it is the World Jewry/Israel Lobby after all)
> but won't lose it's legs due to heavy control by
> Jews and their unthinking followers in the US Left.
> Regarding Kevin Barrett, a good soul to be sure, so it is
> too bad he went nasty and ad hominem attack on Chomsky
> rather than simply refuting his flawed logic regarding 911.
> I pointed out to Barrett the hypocrisy of "911
> Truthers" insisting that the Left Gatekeepers are
> hypocritical when the 911 Truthers themselves are not Truth
> Troops when it comes to a more historically accurate
> understanding of World War II (so often evoked to hammer
> home the point about rising US police state) and the
> "Jewish Holocaust." We constantly hear the
> refrain from these folks (and now Jim Marrs has a new big
> book about those evil "Nazis" taking over the
> world, not World Jewry) about how badly the Nazis behaved
> and the alleged atrocities of the Nazis against Jews, but
> when it comes to a scientifically rigorous and historically
> balanced examination of the Holocaust on a par with what
> brought down Building 7 on 9-11, there is a gigantic double
> standard which scatters concrete dust across the horizon.
> The 911 Truthers cannot respond to this double standard and
> prefer to ignore us Holocaust Revisionist folks as kooks, I
> Furthermore, the 911 Truthers are reluctant to deeply
> investigate the accumulative data that 911 was not only an
> "inside job" but a Jew Job, as documented by our
> good friend Brother Nathanael at www.realjewnews.com. While
> Barrett has broached this topic with some fine guests on his
> program including Splitting the Sky and Barry Zwicker, he
> does not take the ball and run with it. Wonder why.
> Just a few observations from Mars,
> Best, Richard Wilcox, Tokyo
> Shamir replies: Indeed there are some agendas beside that
> of Truthers.
> From Jocelyn Braddel, Dublin
> Dear Israel, I really like and welcome this text about Noam
> Chomsky. A very kind man, a man who never lets the honest
> moment pass him by without taking note of it. I should have
> another Handstand ready in a couple of weeks' time and
> you can be sure that your text will be there! I hope you
> and your family are always well.
> Best regards, Jocelyn
> From Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts
> Thanks for sending. I won't comment on the TM, or
> On what you wrote, only one comment. It's true that
> I've never supported a "one-state
> settlement," and still don't. I also don't
> support it for other complex societies either: like the
> Spanish state, Belgium, the UK, and others. But since
> childhood, I've always, without exception, advocated a
> binational state. I've written about that extensively,
> including books and articles. To my knowledge, I'm one
> of the very few people who actually does advocate a
> binational state -- and I know of no one who advocates a
> one-state settlement. Note that I say
> "advocate," not "propose" or
> "support." One can propose or support anything
> one likes -- that everyone should love one another and live
> in peace, for example. Advocacy requires more than that.
> Shamir responds:
> I stand corrected. Bi-national state in Palestine was
> discussed by Magnes and Brit Shalom some 50 years ago, but
> not often since then; that's why I made this mistake.
> From Tom Mysiewicz, Oregon
> I, too, support rational discourse. And the Jews are not
> responsible for every ill on Earth--although there is
> circumstantial evidence in abundance they played a role in
> The problems I have with the external-mover theory of 911
> are the following:
> *NO personnel or officials responsible for air defenses and
> tactical responses to such situation were disciplined to any
> extent or otherwise punished;
> *Dick Cheney took over prime responsibility for air defense
> in Continental US (CONUS) a month prior to the attacks;
> *Cheney was a signatory on a document in the 1990s longing
> for such an attack;
> *Powdering of concrete, presence of thermite/thermate, the
> rate of collapse, cool-burning fire, etc. ALL point to a
> controlled demolition using internal explosive charges--not
> an air crash. (Note that in WWII the Empire State Building
> survived the crash of a fully loaded bomber plane!);
> *Likewise, in the so-called Pentagon attack we see no
> debris field, wings, engines, correct-size entry hole,
> amount of fire and damage consistent with such a strike,
> *There is evidence that both US and ISraeli intelligence
> had the so-called hijackers under surveillance and that an
> Israeli film crew was set up prior to the
> "attack" at the WTC;
> *WTC #7 collapsed WITHOUT any external causes; and,
> *No substantial efforts were made to close the U.S.-Mexican
> border, where Mid-Easterners could reasonably be expected to
> infiltrate from.
> I do not doubt that U.S. enemies are capable of striking
> the U.S. I just don't think this is an example.
> Tom Mysiewicz
> From Hesham Bahari, Egypt
> Funny I got this email just after I got yours in defence of
> Both you and Chomsky belong to my favourite authors. So I
> hope you understand my disappointment concerning your
> reaction to this question.
> I'm not saying Israel did it, but whoever did is no
> angel, that's for sure. That's a very naive thought
> Empires are built on false flag operations, which sooner or
> later brings them down as well. Pearl Harbor, Tonkin Bay,
> The US Liberty, Berlin's Reichstag etc...
> Taking in consideration the neo-con program which started
> in the 80ies if not before I see no problem in explaining
> 911, not the whos and hows and whens of it, but the whys.
> It's all plain common sense. So please don't mix it
> up with angelology :)
> Any way, I don't like people grasping my buttonhole
> more than you do. But I will keep to my Griffin so long. He
> makes sense to me.
> And of course I agree fully with your defence of Chomsky,
> in spite of my disappointment.
> Air Traffic Controller Peter Zalewski was responsible for
> both New York Tower crashes
> and also was controller for Egypt 990 crash in 1999
> Israel Defense Force Sayeret Matkal Branch -- Sayeret
> Matkal is a deep-penetration unit that has been involved in
> assassinations, the theft of foreign (US) defense,
> financial, industrial and diplomatic secrets and the theft
> and destruction of foreign weapons and research facilities.
> They did 9-11. They were tough enough, bold enough,
> ruthless enough, and Jewish-supremacist-racist enough to
> do 9-11 and lie to our faces and mock us for suspecting
> them ever since. They are tough enough to destroy our
> economy and end our threat as a source of law and justice
> which they are doing very successfully right now. They are
> determined to finish us off before we can take in the facts
> and develop an organized response.
> Full article below:
> From R Logan, the US
> Hello Israel Shamir,
> 911 was a blood sacrifice to Lucifer by the banking elite.
> 911 along with many other "events" are only
> symptoms of the problem. It is like western medicine,
> where they treat the symptoms instead of the problem. The
> patients continue to die. We need to wake up and figure
> out how to eradicate the problem instead of the many
> symptoms that they can continually produce for our
25 lipiec 2008
|Kobieta "z jajami"
sierpień 20, 2008
|Światowy Dzień Chorego - uchwały Primum Non Nocere
luty 11, 2006
listopad 8, 2004
|Imiona Wolności zamocowane na warkoczu
grudzień 26, 2006
Zygmunt Jan Prusiński
|Wieszcze i świnie
kwiecień 1, 2003
|O BANANACH I OPOZYCJI...
i jeszcze raz o bananach
styczeń 9, 2003
|Pod maską zabójczych słów
kwiecień 4, 2004
kwiecień 6, 2006
|Puste kieszenie Polaków.
Jeszcze większa pustka w głowach ekonomistów
luty 18, 2003
luty 6, 2005
wrzesień 10, 2007
|Jeszcze raz o homoseksualistach!
czerwiec 2, 2008
sierpień 16, 2008
|Co z tą Polską? Kto powstrzyma dalszy upadek Polski?
luty 14, 2005
|Kilka uwag na temat Piłsudskiego
listopad 11, 2008
luty 28, 2004
|Bulterier Kaczyńskich - Jacek Kurski znów atakuje. Prawie wszystko o Kurskim.
czerwiec 18, 2006
|Zamglona przejrzystość władzy
wrzesień 6, 2005
|Katastrofa na wschodzie
sierpień 6, 2006
|Znalezisko w zamorskiej kolonii Izraela
kwiecień 21, 2004