|
How Good Was the Good War?
|
|
 Stuart Reid
The consensus Buchanan has challenged holds that World War II was the Good War, the necessary war, precisely because it was against Hitler. If, therefore, you suggest that the war was neither good nor necessary, as Buchanan does, you open yourself to charges of, at best, indifference to the suffering of Jews (and all other people murdered by Hitler) and, at worst, of Nazi sympathies. Or maybe, if you are lucky, of nothing more shameful than stupidity.
I like Pat Buchanan and I admire him. He is a brave and good man and a brilliant journalist. He is by no means the first to express skepticism about the propaganda of the victors, however. More than 40 years ago, in The Origins of the Second World War, A.J.P. Taylor observed that the Poles lost 6.5 million dead in World War II and the Czechs fewer than 100,000, and famously asked, “Which was better—to be a betrayed Czech or a saved Pole?” Only a Pole would be crazy enough to answer without hesitation: a saved Pole.
Thomas E. Woods Jr.
Buchanan makes a strong case against Britain giving a war guarantee to Poland rather than drawing a realistic line in the West that Hitler could not cross without risking war. George Kennan, as mainstream as they come, said so in a letter to Buchanan in 1999. And Ernest May, my old professor at Harvard, noted, “a government that a half-year earlier had resisted going to war for a faraway country with democratic institutions, well-armed military forces, and strong fortifications, now promised with no apparent reservations to go to war for a dictatorship with less-than-modern armed forces and wide-open frontiers.” A swashbuckling Polish regime was thus given the power to decide whether Britain would be drawn into war, a war Britain was absurdly unprepared to wage, much less win.
Ted Galen Carpenter
The argument that the United States could and should have remained on the sidelines in World War II is not entirely convincing—at least with respect to the European theater. It assumes that Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union would have exhausted themselves in a stalemated struggle, and the United States and other Western powers would then have been well positioned to pick up the pieces after the collapse of the two totalitarian giants. The situation might have worked out that way, but such a strategy would have been high-risk. It is equally possible that either Germany or the USSR would have scored a decisive victory and then dominated all of Europe. A Soviet-controlled continent would have been catastrophic; a Europe dominated by Nazi Germany and its volatile, extremely aggressive dictator would have been even worse. Roosevelt deserves criticism for the deceitful way in which he maneuvered America toward war, but his alarm at the danger a totalitarian Europe could pose to America was not misplaced.
Michael Vlahos
Just saying “World War II” is like scratching extra opinion on some great basalt stele. World War II was not a great event: rather, it is the American sacred. Invoking it is not retelling history but repeating homily. Its spare and tight four-year story is the heart of our national narrative.
The power of the World War II sacred comes across like a jolt: just feeling the passion from readers’ comments on Patrick Buchanan’s Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War and the review here by John Lukacs is like underscoring with a razor.
We have seen the World War II sacred trumpeted in full during the 9/11 war. Its ancient rhetoric has been this administration’s neon rod and staff, its fire and brimstone: Munich, Pearl Harbor, Iwo Jima, the Battle of the Bulge. For seven years, political opposition has simply withered before the stainless authority of World War II.
This is the power of American holy war. Our great wars are crystallizing moments along the path of our religious nationalism: defining, reinterpreting, and celebrating ourselves.
|
|
21 lipiec 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imperium na kredyt
luty 11, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
|
Instytut Analiz Bezpieczeństwa Narodowego ProPolonia.pl
marzec 4, 2009
Dariusz Kosiur
|
Co straciliśmy?
Co jeszcze stracimy?
grudzień 10, 2002
Artur Łoboda
|
Antysemityzm jako broń w walce o wyższość Żydów
listopad 7, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
|
Mędrzec ze styropianu
luty 6, 2008
Marek Olżyński
|
Pustynia Obłędowska
grudzień 9, 2003
Artur Łoboda
|
Co z unia ?
październik 28, 2005
przesłała Elżbieta
|
Nasza Polska: Obrońmy Polskę!
luty 4, 2003
|
Pod okupacja zbrodniarzy dokonywane sa zbrodni
luty 19, 2009
...
|
Wyrok za negowanie holokaustu
luty 21, 2006
|
Chiny wykorzystują echa zimnej wojny
marzec 24, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
|
Powrót Ligi
grudzień 12, 2002
http://haggard.w.interia.pl/liga.html
|
Polityczne skutki wojny
marzec 19, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
|
Papież do młodzieży: budujcie cywilizację miłości
lipiec 28, 2002
AFP
|
Nie bedzie Niemiec plul nam w twarz...
wrzesień 26, 2007
.
|
Świat uciszonej pieśni
sierpień 5, 2008
Zygmunt Jan Prusiński
|
Kontrola i eksploatacja mediów w USA i w Polsce
czerwiec 25, 2008
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
|
Dehumanizacja pieniądzem
luty 14, 2005
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
|
Do kraju tego
sierpień 3, 2003
Piotr Czartoryski-Sziler
|
Zadanie specjalne wykonam
lipiec 31, 2004
Jakub Sakowicz
|
więcej -> |
|
