ZAPRASZA.net POLSKA ZAPRASZA KRAKÓW ZAPRASZA TV ZAPRASZA ART ZAPRASZA
Dodaj artykuł  

KIM JESTEŚMY ARTYKUŁY CIEKAWE LINKI 2002-2009 NASZ PATRONAT KRONIKA KRAKOWA DZIŚ W POLSCE

Ciekawe strony

Historia kontroli bankowej w USA 
Dyktatura banków i ich system zadłużający, nie są ograniczone do jednego kraju, ale istnieją w każdym kraju na świecie.  
Kanciarze z Wall Street 
Film przedstawia kulisy Wall street . Metody działania , które doprowadziły w ciągu kilku ostatnich lat do wywołania kryzysu finansowego. 
Niemcy 1940 - Izrael 2009 - Szokujące zdjęcia 
 
Przedsiębiorstwo holokaust 
Telewizyjny wywiad z Normanem Finkelsteinem 
Cała prawda o ataku z 11 września 
Jeden z filmów usułujących przedstawić prawdę i ataku z 11 września 2001 roku 
Ameryka: Od Wolności do faszyzmu 
Amerykanie zaczynają rozumieć - co się dzieje z ich krajem. O tym mówi film pod wskazanym linkiem. 
Cała prawda o World Trade Center 
Filmik dokumentalny przedstawiający wydarzenia z 11 września 2001 roku. 
Strzeżcie się Obamy 
Kto naprawdę stoi za Barakiem Obamą? 
www.globalresearch.ca 
świetne analizy polityczne i gospodarcze w skali mikro i makro + anty-NWO 
whatreallyhappened.com 
Warto dodać ten link do Pana strony: http://whatreallyhappened.com/

99% tez dotyczących religii, polityki i ekonomii i filozofii się pokrywa z tezami zaprasza.net. Topowa strona. 
Nie dajmy się lobbystom energetyki jądrowej! Wywiad z prof. Mirosławem 
Energetyka jądrowa jest przeżytkiem - nadzieje na tanią energię dawała w latach 60. ubiegłego stulecia, czyli przed pół wiekiem. Okazało się natomiast, że jest kosztowna, niebezpieczna, i nie wiadomo, jak poradzić sobie np. z jej odpadami. Istnieje jednak silne lobby łapówkarskie, które wciska energię jądrową do krajów słabych politycznie i gospodarczo. Nie możemy się mu poddać. 
Folksdojcz 
Fantastyczny zespół - poruszający ważne problemy społeczne stworzył bardzo dosadną piosenkę, będącą miksem wywiadu telewizyjnego z śpiewem zespołu. 
Niezależna witryna Alexa Jones'a 
Alex Jones należy do nielicznych ludzi na świecie którzy mają odwagę mówić prawdę o antyspołecznej konspiracji 
Charlie Sheen & Alex Jones on 9/11 
Znany aktor Hollywood aktor zebrał się na odwagę powiedzenia tego co myśli o 11 września 2001 roku 
"patriotyzm" po 1989 roku 
komentarz zbędny 
Ostatni mit (o polityce sowieckiej) 
 
Polscy "nacjonaliści" o żydach 
Po prostu zobaczcie 
Na straży wolności: Goldman Sachs  
Gerald Celente i John Stossel rozmawiają z sędzią Napolitano o różnych, nie do końca jasnych powiązaniach, między amerykańskimi bankami i rządem USA. Największe podejrzenia budzi bank Goldman Sachs, który ma dziwną nadreprezentację we władzach rządowych. Dla przypomnienia, dodam, że pracownikiem tego banku jest były premier RP, Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz, a bank był zamieszany w spekulacje na złotówce. 
Zakrzyczana prawda 
Mamy 2010 rok a zbrodniarze którzy doprowadzili do wielu wojen i kryzysu światowego w w dalszym ciągu - z tupetem - niczym Josef Goebbels kłamią w oczy w kwestii sytuacji gospodarczej świata i Stanów Zjednoczonych
 
Mój dom, mój świat ...  
BOŻENA MAKOWIECKA - MÓJ DOM, MÓJ ŚWIAT...
Tytułowa piosenka z płyty "Mój dom, mój świat" powstała tuż po obaleniu rządu Olszewskiego.
O ile refren podobał się wszystkim, o tyle zwrotki - niekoniecznie... Stąd opóźniona o prawie 20 lat premiera teledysku ... 
więcej ->

 
 

Zwycięstwo Na Niby

Rzadowi neokonserwatystow udalo sie skuteczne zwiesc opinie publiczna w USA tak ze 60% amerykanow wierzy ze USA wygrywa pacyfikacje Iraku wedlug sondazy opinii. Mimo skutedznego krzewienia wiary w zwyciestwo, USA nie jest w stanie ograniczyc walk z ruchem oporu do stanu ponizej intensywnosci zmagan z przed dwu lat.

Strategia USA zawiodla w trzech podstawowych sprawach:
1. Wojskowa pacyfipacja powstancow.
2. Stworzenie sil zbrojnych z Irakijczykow do walki z powstancami.
3. Zjednanie Sunnitow do wspolpracy z rzadem Iraku stworzonym przez USA. Pacyfikacja Iraku moze przeciagac sie dlugo ale strategia zwyciestwa USA zawiodla.

Opor przeciwko obcej okupacji jest powszechny w Iraku przy jednoczesnych konfliktach religijnych Szyitow z Sunitami I etnicznych konfliktow Kurdow manipulowanych przez Izrael z Arabami na tle zbrojnego oporu przewaznie Sunnitow przeciwko USA. Sunnici masowo popieraja powstancow. Juz w kwietniu 2004 wojska USA byly zaskoczone skuteczna ofensywa powstancow i dezercja okolo 80% milicjiantow, ktorzy calymi oddzialami przechodzili na strone powstancow ktorym przekazano 800 karabinow, 27 ciezarowek i 50 aparatow radiowych dostarczonych przez wojsko USA. Nastepnie w listopadzie 2004 po ofenzywie powstancow w miastach Mosul i Ramada znowu 80% policjantow ucieklo na strone ruchu oporu wraz z calym wyposazeniem i uzbrojeniem. Wtedy sprowadzono do tych miast 2000 milicjantow Kurdow (t.zw. peszmurga) miznienawidzonych przez lokalnych Arabow. Do Kurdow przylaczono piec batalionow policji Szyitow na sluzbe w Ramadi, Samarra i Fellujah. W regionie Sunnitow walczyli z powstanscmi komandosi Szyici i Kurdowie pod komenda Amerykanow.
Mimo formowania oddzialow Sunnitow przez wojska USA na ulicach miast Sunnitow patroluja policjanci Kurdowie i Szyici.

Juz w pazdzierniku 2004 prasa donisila ze wzrasta ruch oporu z powodu okupacji I stosowania tortur w czasie przesaluchan ludzi zlapanych w lapankach. General George W. Casey zeznal w pazdzierniku 2004 w kongresie w Waszyngtonie ze wscieklosc powodowana obecnoscia amerykanskich sil okupacyjnych podnosi sily ruchu oporu. Mimo tego w listopadzie 2004 dokonano ostrego ataku na miasto Fellujah gdzie sily USA zniszczyly 50,000 domow uzywaly wbrew prawu miedzynarodowemu smiercionosny bialy sulfur w celu, wedlug ministra obrony Donalda Rumsfeld’a, odstraszenia miejscowych Sunnitow od wspierania, pomagania jak I tolerowania wsrod nich powstancow, wedlug raportu komentatora Washington Post, Jim’a Haogland’a. Skutkiem tych aktow terroru na ludnosci cywilnej okupacja i pacyfikacja Iraku przez USA jest znienawidzona, zwlaszcza przez Sunnitow. ktorych ruch oporu wzrosl w sily w czasie 2005 roku.



"Basically everyone here has the potential to be an insurgent."
Significantly, a new strategy of "political attraction" became the centerpiece of administration policy in Iraq during 2005, while the strategic significance of military operations was deemphasized. A new constitution and elections for the Iraqi parliament were supposed to divide those in the Sunni community who wanted participation in the system from the hard core who would continue their armed resistance.
The political strategy had a fatal weakness, however: it depended on the willingness of Shi'ite leaders who were out for historical revenge against the Sunnis to make far-reaching concessions to Sunni interests. Instead of cooperating with the U.S. strategy, the militant Shi'ites leaders used the constitutional negotiations to marginalize the Sunnis both politically and economically. Even the administration had to admit that the constitution that was drafted – without Sunni agreement – actually reinforced the determination of Sunnis to support armed resistance. The administration’s argument the Sunni population would begin to abandon the insurgency because of their participation in voting has already lost credibility with the media, and it is doubtful that administration policymakers still believe it – if they ever did.
Meanwhile, the Sunni insurgency, which had been a loose network of independent armed groups with no common agenda, was morphing into a movement capable of effectively coordinating both military operations and political strategy. During 2005, the leaders of several major insurgent organizations cooperated in developing a flexible strategy that encompasses Sunni participation in voting and even in the national assembly, as well as negotiations with the United States. The overall objectives of this emerging Sunni political-military movement are to increase pressure on the US to agree to a settlement and to improve the relative power position of Sunnis in the new political order. The evidence also indicates that that the Sunni insurgents have been able to cooperate with both the Association of Muslim Scholars and Sunni politicians in advancing a broad Sunni political-military strategy.
The failure of the "political strategy" leaves the administration with no plan that promises the defeat of the insurgents. The failure of all three elements of US strategy in Iraq suggests that the administration will be forced in the end to negotiate some kind of an agreement with the insurgents to end the resistance. Indeed, the process may already have begun, even as Bush insists that the United States is winning the war. When it comes, that agreement will undoubtedly be preceded by still more such bluster and by an escalation of violence. But it will represent a true compromise, not a peace imposed by the United States. And the national debate over whether the entire endeavor was a success or a failure will begin.



December 24, 2005
Why the War Has Already Been Lost
by Gareth Porter
The Bush administration has just provided a textbook demonstration of the successful manipulation of public opinion. By repeating the theme that the United States is winning the war in Iraq for weeks, George W. Bush has now convinced 60 percent of Americans that the United States will win, and nearly as many that it is already winning, according to the latest ABC/Washington Post poll.
Despite the new surge of public belief in victory, however, the United States is no closer to success in defeating the insurgency – in the sense of unilaterally reducing its operations to a minimum level – than it was two years ago. On the contrary, all three major elements of US strategy in Iraq – US military operations against the insurgents, creating indigenous security forces and the political attraction of Sunnis into the Iraqi political system – have been shown to have failed to achieve any traction. The US may continue the war for some time, but it no longer has any strategy for winning.
The improbability of United States defeating the Sunni resistance is inherent in the nature of the Iraq conflict. It is a sectarian (Sunni vs. Shi'ite) and ethnic (Kurdish vs. Arab) struggle for power combined with a nationalist armed resistance, mainly by Sunnis, to foreign military occupation. The possibility of suppressing the insurgency has always hinged on the loyalties of the Sunni population within the Sunni-dominated provinces of Central Iraq. A review of the major developments of the past two and a half years suggests that there was never any possibility that those loyalties would shift away from support of the insurgency.
By the end of 2004, in fact, the US command faced a dual strategic crisis: on one hand, it recognized that the US military presence was serving to drive Sunnis into the arms of the insurgents; on the other hand, the United States had been unable to maintain Sunni security forces, because it had demonstrated over and over again that the loyalty of those troops was to the Sunni anti-occupation forces.
In April 2004, the complacency of the US command was shattered by an insurgent offensive across the entire expanse of the Sunni zone that effectively disintegrated the Sunni military units which the United States had set up. According to a June 2004 GAO report, the number of Civil Defense Corps troops in the three Sunni provinces fell by 82 percent from 5,600 to about 1,000. It was not a matter of individual members being intimidated into failing to show up for work, either. As the GAO report pointed out, the destruction of the Sunni security structure was achieved mostly by the "collective desertion of units."
That debacle was followed immediately by a US effort to create a military force put together by the former Ba'athist officer whom the Americans had picked to head Iraq’s intelligence service. The "Fallujah Brigade" was supposed to be an alternative to a bloody US assault on that Sunni city. But instead the brigade’s Sunni troops and officers collaborated with the insurgents in Fallujah, giving them 800 assault rifles, 27 pickup trucks and 50 radios which had been provided by the US command.
An insurgent offensive in Mosul and Ramadi in November again dramatically illustrated the inability of the occupation to obtain the loyalty of Sunnis security forces. Three thousand two hundred of the 4,000 policemen in Mosul deserted overnight, and helped the insurgents to the weapons, radios, uniforms and vehicles from seven police stations. In Ramadi, the Americans distrusted the Sunni police so much that they unilaterally disbanded the entire force.
The US command would never again trust Sunnis to form local security forces. Instead it brought in nearly 2,000 Kurdish peshmurga militiamen to control Mosul. It also brought in five battalions of predominantly Shi'ite troops, with a smattering of Kurds, to replace the Sunni police in Ramadi, Samarra and Fallujah. The Iraqi commando units brought into fight in the Sunni provinces are also Shi'ites and Kurds.
These deployments further reinforced Sunni loyalties to the insurgency, because of the intense dislike and distrust between the Sunni population and the non-Sunni militias and commandoes. Despite administration claims that it has succeeded in recruiting 5,000 Sunni soldiers in 2005, the fact remains that it is still Shi'ites and Kurds who patrol the streets of Sunni cities and who search for Sunni insurgents.
Meanwhile, the US military command was beginning to realize that its operations against the Sunni insurgency were having the perverse effect of increasing support for the resistance. A "senior military officer" (probably the top commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey) was quoted by the Washington Post in October 2004as saying that the insurgency had expanded because of Iraqi "irritation" with the occupation and the mistreatment of detainees. A year later, Casey would admit publicly to Congress that "anger" generated by the U.S. military presence was making the insurgency stronger.
Against this background of a dawning realization that US strategy was not working, the US attack on Fallujah in November 2004 has all earmarks of a high-risk gamble. Before taking full control of the city, US forces destroyed about seventy percent of the 50,000 homes in the city and used the outlawed chemical white phosphorous. The real objective of this extraordinarily excessive use of force, as Washington Post columnist Jim Hoagland explained after interviewing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, was to "dissuade Sunni townspeople from joining, supporting or tolerating the insurrection." The suffering imposed on Fallujah was to be an object lesson to the rest of the Sunni heartland.
However, the assault on Fallujah has apparently had the opposite effect. To the Sunni population, it quickly became a symbol of the atrocities of the occupation forces. The insurgency grew stronger rather than weaker in 2005. Even in Fallujah itself, despite extremely heavy controls over the returning population, the insurgents still have overwhelming support from the population. A US official in the city recently admitted, "Basically everyone here has the potential to be an insurgent."
Significantly, a new strategy of "political attraction" became the centerpiece of administration policy in Iraq during 2005, while the strategic significance of military operations was deemphasized. A new constitution and elections for the Iraqi parliament were supposed to divide those in the Sunni community who wanted participation in the system from the hard core who would continue their armed resistance.
The political strategy had a fatal weakness, however: it depended on the willingness of Shi'ite leaders who were out for historical revenge against the Sunnis to make far-reaching concessions to Sunni interests. Instead of cooperating with the U.S. strategy, the militant Shi'ites leaders used the constitutional negotiations to marginalize the Sunnis both politically and economically. Even the administration had to admit that the constitution that was drafted – without Sunni agreement – actually reinforced the determination of Sunnis to support armed resistance. The administration’s argument the Sunni population would begin to abandon the insurgency because of their participation in voting has already lost credibility with the media, and it is doubtful that administration policymakers still believe it – if they ever did.
Meanwhile, the Sunni insurgency, which had been a loose network of independent armed groups with no common agenda, was morphing into a movement capable of effectively coordinating both military operations and political strategy. During 2005, the leaders of several major insurgent organizations cooperated in developing a flexible strategy that encompasses Sunni participation in voting and even in the national assembly, as well as negotiations with the United States. The overall objectives of this emerging Sunni political-military movement are to increase pressure on the US to agree to a settlement and to improve the relative power position of Sunnis in the new political order. The evidence also indicates that that the Sunni insurgents have been able to cooperate with both the Association of Muslim Scholars and Sunni politicians in advancing a broad Sunni political-military strategy.
The failure of the "political strategy" leaves the administration with no plan that promises the defeat of the insurgents. The failure of all three elements of US strategy in Iraq suggests that the administration will be forced in the end to negotiate some kind of an agreement with the insurgents to end the resistance. Indeed, the process may already have begun, even as Bush insists that the United States is winning the war. When it comes, that agreement will undoubtedly be preceded by still more such bluster and by an escalation of violence. But it will represent a true compromise, not a peace imposed by the United States. And the national debate over whether the entire endeavor was a success or a failure will begin.


www.pogonowski.com
26 grudzień 2005

Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski 

  

Archiwum

Jan Paweł II
listopad 22, 2005
Jan Paweł II
Człowiek człowiekowi zgotował taki los
styczeń 11, 2008
Dorota Feluś
Merkel i niemiecka hipokryzja
sierpień 27, 2008
Jan Engelgard
Francja przoduje w budowie elektrowni nuklearnych
marzec 29, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Kiepscy
grudzień 4, 2003
Ruch Przełomu Narodowego
czerwiec 19, 2008
Dariusz Kosiur
KTO RZˇDZI ŚWIATEM?
styczeń 24, 2004
AOL przyznaje się do przekłamań w księgowości
sierpień 15, 2002
PAP
PiS nie wepchnal Polski do jewRopejskiego kolchozu, nie uchwalil budzetu na rok 2006, ani nie podpisal porozumienia wyslania
czerwiec 17, 2006
jasiek z toronto
"Solidarność" - Krystalizacja ruchu społecznego po wielkiej rewolcie Tezy i pytania Partia, czyli obrońca ancien re
czerwiec 2, 2002
Andrzej Friszke
UPA
padziernik 18, 2006
przesłał Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Czy Polacy to idioci?
maj 4, 2007
Mirosław Naleziński, Gdynia
Prasa finansowa i emisje akcji | Jaka wiarygodność?
czerwiec 15, 2005
Andrzej Sielecki
Kosowo nowe "państewko"
luty 19, 2008
Jacek Bartyzel
Dług Polski
luty 27, 2006
Goska
Oczyscic Kosciol
listopad 22, 2006
x
Zabójstwo ośmieszone
listopad 18, 2007
Artur Łoboda
Prawda o prześladowaniu Arabów w Palestynie
grudzień 3, 2006
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
Wielka Smuta Żebrowskiego
padziernik 31, 2007
PAP
France Telecom uratowana przez internet i komórki
marzec 8, 2007
AFP
więcej ->
 
   


Kontakt

Fundacja Promocji Kultury
Copyright © 2002 - 2012 Polskie Niezależne Media